Gomez, Arturo










IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. WR-80,969-01





EX PARTE ARTURO GOMEZ, Applicant





ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2011CRJ898-D2(A) IN THE 111TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM WEBB COUNTY





            Per curiam.

 

O R D E R


            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to imprisonment for twenty-five years. He did not appeal his conviction.

            Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. Trial counsel shall: (1) state whether she investigated Applicant’s competency and believed Applicant was competent to plead guilty; (2) describe her investigation, if any, of Applicant’s competency; and (3) state whether she advised Applicant of his right to appeal and Applicant indicated to her that he wished to file an appeal. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

            Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

            The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether: (1) counsel investigated Applicant’s competency and believed Applicant was competent to plead guilty; (2) Applicant was competent to plead guilty; (3) counsel advised Applicant of his right to appeal; and (4) Applicant indicated to counsel that he wished to appeal. The trial court shall also determine whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced because counsel failed to: (1) investigate Applicant’s competency; (2) timely urge a motion for reconsideration or reduction of sentence; or (3) advise Applicant of his appellate rights and file a notice of appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.

            This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

 

Filed: March 19, 2014

Do not publish