IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-76,062-03
EX PARTE ARMANDO MADRID, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 4079-A IN THE 109TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM ANDREWS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of driving while
intoxicated and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.
Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because of counsel’s bad advice and
unprofessional errors. Applicant alleges that counsel failed to raise the affirmative defense of statute
of limitations, failed to investigate the facts of the case, and failed to challenge the void enhancement
paragraph. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these
2
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and
involuntary plea. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07,
§ 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant’s
claim that his plea was involuntary. The trial court shall make findings as to whether the
performance of Applicant’s attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make findings as to whether the State
is prejudiced by Applicant’s delay in presenting this claim under the doctrine of laches. The trial
court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and
appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: June 3, 2015
Do not publish