IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-82,979-01
IN RE MARIO PEREZ, Relator
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NOS. 2006-CR-5055B-W1, 2006-CR-5056B-W1, AND 2006-CR-5057B-W1 IN
THE 399TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM BEXAR COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original
jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed three applications for writs of habeas corpus
in the 399th District Court of Bexar County, and that the applications have not yet been forwarded
to this Court. Relator alleges that the trial court entered an order designating issues, but this Court
has no record of a timely order designating issues in any of these cases.
In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Bexar
County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas
corpus applications, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be
2
investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Bexar County. Should the
response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was
served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. If a timely order
designating issues was entered but it has been more than 180 days since the State received service
of the applications, the District Clerk of Bexar County shall forward the applications to this Court
without awaiting resolution of the issues designated by the trial court. This application for leave
to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate
response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.
Filed: March 25, 2015
Do not publish