TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-13-00288-CR
Johnny Moreno, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 07-712-K368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Johnny Moreno is serving two concurrent twenty-five year prison sentences imposed
in 2008 after he pleaded guilty to and was convicted of burglary and aggravated robbery. See Tex.
Penal Code §§ 29.03, 30.02. Appellant appeals an order by the district court denying his motion for
post-conviction forensic DNA testing. In its order, the trial court found that appellant “has not
shown by a preponderance of the evidence that a reasonable probability exists that [appellant] would
not have been prosecuted or convicted if exculpatory results had been obtained through DNA
testing.” See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 64.03(a)(1)(A)(i).
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting
a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be
advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763,
766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 86–87 (1988). Appellant
received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and
to file a pro se brief. We have received appellant’s pro se brief.
We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellant
counsel’s brief and appellant’s pro se brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at
744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and
the appeal is frivolous. The points of error raised in appellant’s pro se brief have no arguable merit.
See Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 827.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court’s order denying DNA
testing is affirmed.
__________________________________________
Scott K. Field, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field
Affirmed
Filed: October 24, 2013
Do Not Publish
2