TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00634-CV
D. L. P., Jr., Appellant
v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 340TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. C-11-0072-CPS, HONORABLE JAY K. WEATHERBY, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
D.L.P., Jr. filed this accelerated appeal from the district court’s decree terminating
his parental rights to his minor child, T-E.D.E., terminating the parental rights of T-E.D.E.’s mother,
C.A.E., and appointing the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services as T-E.D.E.’s
permanent managing conservator.
D.L.P., Jr.’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967) by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See 386 U.S. at 744; see also Taylor v. Texas Dep’t of
Protective & Regulatory Servs., 160 S.W.3d 641, 646-47 (Tex. App.—Austin 2005, pet. denied)
(applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights). Counsel certified to this
Court that she provided D.L.P., Jr. with a copy of the Anders brief and notice of his right to examine
the appellate record and file a pro se brief. D.L.P., Jr. did not file a pro se brief.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit. Finding nothing in the record that might arguably support an appeal, we grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the order of termination.
Jeff Rose, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Affirmed
Filed: January 30, 2013
2