Dr. Kyle Janek, Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission And Doug Wilson, Inspector General for the Office of Inspector General v. Harlingen Family Dentistry, P.C.

Related Cases

Dr. Kyle Janek, Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission And Doug Wilson, Inspector General for the Office of Inspector General v. Harlingen Family Dentistry, P.C.
M&M Orthodontics P.A.and Harlingen Family Dentistry v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission Dr. Kyle Janek, in His Official Capacity as the Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission Carole Hurley, Chief Administrative Law Judge for the Texas Health and Human Services Commiss
M&M Orthodontics P.A.and Harlingen Family Dentistry v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission Dr. Kyle Janek, in His Official Capacity as the Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission Carole Hurley, Chief Administrative Law Judge for the Texas Health and Human Services Commiss
M&M Orthodontics P.A.and Harlingen Family Dentistry v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission Dr. Kyle Janek, in His Official Capacity as the Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission Carole Hurley, Chief Administrative Law Judge for the Texas Health and Human Services Commiss
Harlingen Family Dentistry, P.C. And Trueblood Dental Associates, P.A. v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission and Office of the Inspector General

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 30, 2014 NO. 03-13-00625-CV Dr. Kyle Janek, Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission; and Doug Wilson, Inspector General for the Office of Inspector General, Appellants v. Harlingen Family Dentistry, P.C., Appellee APPEAL FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 2, 2013. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.