DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 10, 2015
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-15-00921-CV
ANN STOKLEY, Appellant
V.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE FOR CWABS, INC. ASSET-
BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2003-1, Appellee
On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-03285
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart
Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
In a letter dated August 11, 2015, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal.
Specifically, there does not appear to be an appealable order. We instructed appellant to file a
letter brief addressing our concern. Appellant filed a jurisdictional brief, pro se.
Generally, this Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments and those
interlocutory orders specifically authorized by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 30
S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352 (Tex. 2001);
Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). A final
judgment is one that disposes of all pending parties and claims. See Lehmann, 30 S.W.3d at 195.
In her notice of appeal, appellant states she is appealing the denial of her special
appearance. A person may appeal from an interlocutory order that grants or denies a special
appearance under rule 120a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.
CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(7) (West 2015). The record before this Court, however, does not contain
an order on the appellant’s special appearance. In her jurisdictional brief, appellant
acknowledges that there is no signed order denying her special appearance. Appellant relies on
the trial court’s oral ruling on the record at the hearing on her motion. An oral rendition is not
sufficient. The appellate timetable runs from the date the judgment or order is signed. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 26.1, Farmer v. Ben E. Keith Co., 907 S.W.2d 495, 496 (Tex. 1995) (per curiam).
The record before this Court does not contain an appealable order. Accordingly, we
dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
150921F.P05
/Carolyn Wright/____________________
CAROLYN WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
ANN STOKLEY, Appellant On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District
Court, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-15-00921-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-03285.
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart
AS TRUSTEE FOR CWABS, INC. ASSET- participating.
BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2003-
1, Appellee
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE
FOR CWABS, INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2003-1 recover its costs of
this appeal from appellant ANN STOKLEY.
Judgment entered September 10, 2015.
–3–