Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and Exonmobile Pipeline Co.

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases

                                    COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                               FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                         ORDER ON MOTIONS

Cause number:            01-15-00266-CV
Style:                   Unocal Pipeline Co. v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips
                         Transportation Alaska, Inc. and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co.
Date motions filed*:     September 15, 2015
Type of motions:         Unopposed Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Steven G. Reed and
                         Lara E. Romansic; Motions of Resident Attorney Michael V. Powell in
                         Support of Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Steven G. Reed and
                         Lara E. Romansic
Parties filing motions: Appellees BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips Transportation
                         Alaska, Inc., and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co.
Document to be filed:    N/A

Is appeal accelerated?      No.

Ordered that motions are:

          Granted
              If document is to be filed, document due: N/A
          Denied
          Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
          Other: _____________________________________




Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
                                                 Acting for the Court

Date: September 17, 2015




November 7, 2008 Revision