USCA1 Opinion
November 3, 1992 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
___________________
Nos. 92-1751
92-1752
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
AMPARO TORO-ARISTIZABAL,
Defendant, Appellant.
__________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
___________________
Before
Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Torruella and Cyr, Circuit Judges,
______________
___________________
Amparo Toro-Aristizabal on brief pro se.
_______________________
A. John Pappalardo, United States Attorney, and Stephen P.
___________________ __________
Heymann, Assistant United States Attorney, on Motion for Summary
_______
Disposition for appellee.
__________________
__________________
Per Curiam. On this consolidated appeal, we
___________
summarily affirm the district court's denial of appellant's
"Motion for Stay of Judgment" as moot. We also affirm the
district court's denial of appellant's "Motion to Correct
Judgment and Commitment Order Restitution on Count Three of
the Indictment," which was improperly brought under Fed. R.
Crim. P. 35(a). This affirmance is without prejudice to any
rights appellant may have to pursue a petition under 28
U.S.C. 2255, should she contend that relief is properly
available to her under that statute.
So ordered.
__________
-2-