LeBlanc v. Raytheon

USCA1 Opinion









December 29, 1992 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 92-1683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL,
ROLAND A. LEBLANC,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

RAYTHEON COMPANY,

Defendant, Appellee.

___________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. A. David Mazzone, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Circuit Judge,
_____________

Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
____________________

and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
_____________

____________________

Philip R. Olenick for appellant.
_________________
Richard A. Sauber, with whom Kenneth S. Kramer, P.C.,
___________________ _________________________
Douglas W. Baruch, Maureen C. Shay, and Fried, Frank, Harris,
__________________ ________________ ______________________
Shriver & Jacobson, were on brief for appellee.
__________________



____________________


____________________
















Per Curiam. Appellant LeBlanc's brought suit against
__________

appellee Raytheon Company brought under the False Claims Act, 31

U.S.C. 3729. In his complaint, he alleged that Raytheon

defrauded the United States. The district court dismissed the

complaint on res judicata grounds. We affirm the district

court's judgment and award double costs to appellee. See United
___ ______

States ex rel. LeBlanc v. Raytheon Co., No. 92-10999 (D. Mass.
_______________________ _____________

May 15, 1992).

Affirmed. Double costs to appellee.
________ ________________________