USCA1 Opinion
May 25, 1993
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 92-2409
JAMES M. MOONEY,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ETC.,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Martin F. Loughlin, Senior U.S. District Judge]
__________________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Cyr and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
James M. Mooney on brief pro se.
_______________
Peter E. Papps, Acting United States Attorney, and Gretchen Leah
______________ _____________
Witt, Assistant United States Attorney, on Motion for Summary
____
Disposition, for appellee.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. We have reviewed the record and the
___________
parties' submissions and are persuaded that the district court
properly dismissed the instant civil action for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. Moreover, where appellant's complaint was not timely
filed, transfer to the Federal Circuit was not in the interests of
justice under 28 U.S.C. 1631. Accordingly, the judgment of the
district court is affirmed. Appellant's multiple objections to our
________
orders denying his motions for oral argument and appellant's motion
for authentication are denied.
______