USCA1 Opinion
May 25, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
___________________
No. 93-1152
JOSEPH R. GLIDDEN,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant, Appellee.
__________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
___________________
Before
Selya, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________
___________________
Perry O'Brian on brief for appellant.
_____________
Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, and Michael M.
_________________ __________
DuBose, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
______
__________________
__________________
Per Curiam. We have reviewed the record and
___________
conclude that the district court's findings were not clearly
erroneous. Counsel adequately informed appellant of the
government's proposed plea offer and of the likely sentencing
benefit of cooperating with the government. The judgment is
summarily affirmed pursuant to First Circuit Rule 27.1.
-2-