USCA1 Opinion
July 13, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 94-1003
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
THOMAS P. ATWOOD,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
No. 94-1095
LAWRENCE EDWARD WOOLSTON,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Selya and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Thomas P. Atwood on brief pro se.
________________
Lawrence Edward Woolston on brief pro se.
________________________
Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, and Michael M. DuBose,
________________ __________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellees.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. The judgments in the above-captioned
___________
appeals are affirmed on the basis of our decisions in United
______
States v. Dimeo, ___ F.3d ___, No. 93-2272 (1st Cir. July 7,
______ _____
1994), and United States v. Boot, ___ F.3d ___, No. 93-2317
_____________ ____
(1st Cir. June 7, 1994).
Affirmed.
________