USCA1 Opinion
July 11, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
FIRST CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 94-1173
DANIEL, MANN, JOHNSON & MENDENHALL and
DANIEL, MANN, JOHNSON & MENDENHALL INTERNATIONAL,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE, INC.,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Cyr and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Robert G. Abrams, with whom Lee P. Curtis, Joanne E. Caruso,
_________________ ______________ _________________
Robert E. Leidenheimer, Jr., Howrey & Simon, A. Van C. Lanckton, and
___________________________ ______________ ___________________
Craig and MaCauley, P.C., were on brief for appellants.
________________________
John A.D. Gilmore, with whom Carl M. Sapers and Hill & Barlow
__________________ _______________ ______________
were on brief for appellee.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. This appeal from a district court order
Per Curiam
__________
denying appellants' motion for a preliminary injunction against
the continuation of arbitration proceedings before the American
Arbitration Association ("AAA") is dismissed as moot, see McLane
___ ______
v. Mercedes-Benz of No. Am., 3 F.3d 522, 524 (1st Cir. 1993), due
________________________
to the issuance, on June 15, 1994, of an arbitral award in the
AAA proceedings sought to be enjoined by appellants. According-
ly, the appeal is summarily dismissed, see Loc. R. 27.1, with
___
costs to appellee, and the case is remanded to the district court
for further proceedings.
SO ORDERED.
SO ORDERED
__ _______