USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 94-1304
ERIC DAVIS,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CLASSIFICATION
BOARD, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Martin F. Loughlin, Senior U.S. District Judge]
__________________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________
Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Eric Davis on brief pro se.
__________
Jeffrey R. Howard, Attorney General, and Lucy C. Hodder,
___________________ _________________
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.
____________________
September 2, 1994
____________________
Per Curiam. Because the order from which plaintiff
___________
seeks to appeal is not a "final decision" under 28 U.S.C.
1291, because no certification under 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) has
been granted, and because no other basis for interlocutory
appeal exists, the appeal is dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction.
Dismissed.
__________