USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
____________________
No. 93-2156
EDWIN SANCHEZ,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
No. 93-2157
RAFAEL SANCHEZ,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant, Appellee.
________________
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
_________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________
Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Edwin Sanchez on brief pro se.
_____________
Cheryl J. Sturm on brief for appellant Rafael Sanchez.
_______________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Heidi E. Brieger,
________________ ________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
____________________
November 29, 1994
____________________
Per Curiam. The district court's denial of the
__________
motions to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255 filed by
appellants Edwin and Rafael Sanchez is affirmed for the
________
reasons stated in the district court's September 14, 1993
memorandum and order.
-2-