USCA1 Opinion
December 21, 1994
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 94-1595
GERTRUDE A. GOROD,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Edward F. Harrington, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Cyr, Circuit Judge, _____________
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Stahl, Circuit Judge. _____________
____________________
Gertrude Gorod on brief pro se. ______________
Joseph L. DeLorey on brief for appellees. _________________
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. Pro se plaintiff Gertrude Gorod has sued __________ ___ __
her former union, the National Association of Government
Employees (NAGE) and its president, Kenneth Lyons, alleging
that they intentionally discriminated against her on the
basis of her age, sex, and religion in violation of Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. 621 et seq. We have thoroughly
reviewed the record and the parties' briefs on appeal and are
persuaded that the district court's analysis is correct.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. ________
See Local Rule 27.1. ___