USCA1 Opinion
June 2, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCIUT
____________________
No. 95-1124
RALPH J. CATALDO,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
CNA INSURANCE CO.,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge. ___________
Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Ralph J. Cataldo on brief pro se. ________________
Glenn H. Robinson, Thompson & Bowie on brief for appellee. _________________ ________________
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. We have read carefully the record in this __________
case and the briefs of the parties. We have considered the
various claims raised by appellant and find none to possess
merit. We affirm the grant of summary judgment to appellee,
essentially for the reasons given by the district court in
its memorandum and order, dated January 9, 1995.
Appellant's motion to "strike or vacate court order of
April 18, 1995," is denied as moot. While we agree with ______
appellee that the statements contained in appellant's
"notification of the creation of false and fictitious
evidence" were completely without foundation and were not
properly presented to this court, we do not deem it necessary
to grant appellee's motion to strike the "notification" as
the court has disregarded it in the consideration of this
case. See Fine v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 171 F.2d 571, ___ ____ _______________________
575 (7th Cir. 1948).
Affirmed. ________