USCA1 Opinion
November 14, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 95-1380
JAMES McLAUGHLIN,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
James McLaughlin on brief pro se. ________________
Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, Frank W. Hunger, __________________ _________________
Assistant Attorney General, Marleigh D. Dover and Jennifer Hay Zacks, _________________ __________________
Attorneys, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, Department of Justice, on
brief for appellees.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the record __________
and the briefs of the parties and summarily affirm the
judgment of the district court for essentially the reasons
stated in the recommended decision of the magistrate judge.
The district court adopted the reasoning of this decision
when it dismissed appellant's complaint, and we, too, think
that reasoning is persuasive. Appellant's motion for summary
disposition is therefore denied.
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.1. ________ ___
-3-