Cruz-Rosado v. SHHS

USCA1 Opinion




December 28, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


____________________


No. 95-1620

RAUL CRUZ-ROSADO,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Jaime Pieras, Jr., U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Stahl and Lynch,
Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Juan A. Hernandez Rivera and Raymond Rivera Esteves on brief for ________________________ _______________________
appellant.
Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Maria Hortensia Rios, _____________ ______________________
Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Robert M. Peckrill, Assistant Regional ___________________
Counsel, Social Security Administration, on brief for appellee.


____________________


____________________






















Per Curiam. We affirm substantially for the reasons ___________

stated by the district court. In addition, we note the

following. The ALJ was not bound by the 1980 RFC, an RFC

completed prior to an operation the ALJ supportably concluded

was successful. On the scant evidence before him, the ALJ

could permissibly conclude that claimant had failed

adequately to demonstrate that claimant's ability to

walk/stand was significantly compromised. Even if claimant

developed a hernia and another varicose vein some months

later, the ALJ was not required to find that claimant was

disabled prior to the expiration of insured status in view of

the sparse medical evidence.

Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1. ________



























-2-