USCA1 Opinion
[Not for Publication] [Not for Publication]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 95-1990
DAVID H. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN EMPIRE SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Charles B. Swartwood III, U.S. Magistrate Judge] _____________________
____________________
Before
Boudin, Circuit Judge, _____________
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Lynch, Circuit Judge. _____________
____________________
Douglas Q. Meystre and Fletcher, Tilton & Whipple, P.C. on brief __________________ ________________________________
for appellant.
Joseph P. Musacchio, John F. Rooney, III and Melick & Porter on ____________________ ____________________ _______________
brief for appellee.
____________________
March 11, 1996
____________________
Per Curiam. We agree with the magistrate judge that the __________
critical language of the insurance policy is not ambiguous
and that the plain meaning accords with the result suggested
by considering the entire policy and reasonable expectations.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum of
the magistrate judge, the judgment is affirmed pursuant to ________
Local Rule 27.1.
-2- -2-