USCA1 Opinion
May 13, 1996 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 95-1545
SCOTT PHILIP BROOKER,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Shane Devine, Senior U.S. District Judge] __________________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Cyr and Lynch,
Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Scott Philip Brooker on brief pro se. ____________________
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. We have reviewed the record and ___________
plaintiff's arguments. We affirm for the reasons stated in
the district court's May 4, 1995 order of dismissal.
Affirmed. ________
-2-