USCA1 Opinion
June 24, 1996
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 95-2110
WALTER R. SIMPSON, JR.,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
GEORGE A. VOSE, JR., ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Cyr and Lynch,
Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Walter R. Simpson, Jr. on brief pro se. ______________________
Michael B. Grant, Senior Legal Counsel, Rhode Island Department _________________
of Corrections, on brief for appellees.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. We affirm the judgment substantially for __________
the reasons recited in the magistrate-judge's report dated
August 11, 1995. See also Figueroa v. Vose, 81 F.3d 147, ________ ________ ____
1996 WL 136891 (1st Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (table).
Inasmuch as plaintiff did not incur any loss of good-time
credits, we voice no opinion as to whether such a sanction
might give rise to a liberty interest under Sandin v. Conner, ______ ______
115 S. Ct. 2293 (1995).
Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1. ____________________________
-2-