USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 96-1444
SCOTT PHILIP BROOKER,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER, NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Scott Brooker on brief pro se. _____________
Jeffrey R. Howard, Attorney General, and Stephen J. Judge, Senior _________________ ________________
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.
____________________
November 26, 1996
____________________
Per Curiam. Appellant Scott Philip Brooker sued __________
defendants under 42 U.S.C. 1983, alleging that they were
deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in
violation of the Eighth Amendment. He now appeals from the
district court's grant of summary judgment in defendants'
favor. After careful review of the record, we affirm
substantially for the reasons given by the district court in
its decision dated April 1, 1996.
Affirmed. _________
-2-