USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION] [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
_________________________
No. 96-1503
JESUS SALAS-RIJOS AND ANA SALAS,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
COSTA CRUISE LINES, N.V., ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
_________________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
_________________________
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge, _____________
Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Lynch, Circuit Judge. _____________
_________________________
Harry A. Ezratty on brief for appellants. ________________
William A. Graffam, Jos Luis Su rez-Villafa e, and Jimenez, __________________ __________________________ ________
Graffam & Lausell on brief for appellees. _________________
_________________________
January 14, 1997
_________________________
Per Curiam. Having reviewed the record and considered Per Curiam. __________
the parties' briefs, we are fully persuaded that the court below
did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the
defendant. Since the reasons underlying this ruling are clearly
set forth in the district court's opinion, see Salas-Rijos v. ___ ___________
Costa Cruise Lines, N.V., No. 94-2342CCC (D.P.R. Feb. 9, 1995), ________________________
we need go no further. Instead, we affirm the judgment for
substantially the reasons elucidated by Chief Judge Cerezo in her
well-reasoned rescript.
Affirmed. Affirmed. ________
2