USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 97-1142
PRASEUTH PANTHONG,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
MARY E. MAHONEY,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Boudin, Circuit Judge. _____________
____________________
Praseuth Panthong on brief pro se. _________________
Terence P. O'Malley, Associate Counsel, University of _______________________
Massachusetts, on brief for appellee.
____________________
May 22, 1997
____________________
Per Curiam. The order that this court issued on ___________
December 4, 1995 in appeal no. 95-2043 established that the
notice of default that appellant previously secured was
properly vacated and thus is null and void. That default did
not provide appellant with any basis for filing the
bankruptcy petition that gives rise to the present appeal.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. ________
See Local Rule 27.1. Appellant's request for payment of an ___
administrative expense is moot. ____
-2-