United States v. Picardi

USCA1 Opinion












[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 97-1366

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

PASQUALE MUNAFO, A/K/A PAT, A/K/A FAT PAT,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

John Wall on brief for appellant. _________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, James C. Rehnquist and _______________ ___________________
Ernest S. Dinisco, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief for __________________
appellee.


____________________

October 14, 1997
____________________


















Per Curiam. Upon careful review, we perceive no clear __________

error in the district court's determination of the amount of

loss. Further, no improper double counting occurred in

adjusting appellant's sentence both for his managerial role

in the offense under U.S.S.G. 3B1.1(b), as well as for his

business of receiving and selling stolen property under

U.S.S.G. 2B1.1(b)(4)(B). See United States v. Reeves, 83 ___ _____________ ______

F.3d 203, 208 (8th Cir. 1996).

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1. ________ ___



































-2-