Howard v. State

USCA1 Opinion












[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 97-1241


KENNETH HOWARD, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, WATER RESOURCES BOARD,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Ernest C. Torres, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge, _____________
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Lynch, Circuit Judge. _____________

____________________

John W. Dineen and Yesser, Glasson & Dineen on brief for ________________ ___________________________
appellants.
Jeffrey B. Pine, Attorney General, and Rebecca Tedford __________________ _________________
Partington, Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee. __________


____________________

October 14, 1997
____________________















Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the briefs and __________

record, we conclude that appellants' complaint properly was

dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state

a claim and that their motion to amend the complaint properly

was denied as futile. We reach this conclusion for

substantially the same reasons stated by the district court

in its Memorandum and Order dated December 31, 1996.

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1. ________ ___





































-2-