USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 97-1810
FRIEDRICH LU,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
DAVID CHRISTIANI, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Richard Stearns, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Friedrich Lu on brief pro se. ____________
Susan M. Donnelly, B.B.O. and Murphy & Riley, P.C. on brief for __________________________ _____________________
appellees.
____________________
December 18, 1997
____________________
Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the briefs and __________
record, we conclude that the district court properly
dismissed appellant's amended complaint because it did not
state a cognizable federal claim. To the extent that
appellant attempts to raise other issues in this appeal,
those issues do not merit further comment.
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1. ________ ___
-2-