USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 96-2127
JOSEPH M. CRAVEIRO, JR.,
Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Robert W. Lovegreen, U.S. Magistrate Judge] _____________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Joseph M. Craveiro on brief pro se. __________________
Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, and Margaret E. ___________________ ____________
Curran, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee. ______
____________________
February 3, 1998
____________________
Per Curiam. After carefully reviewing the record __________
and the parties' briefs, we summarily affirm the judgment of
the district court on the basis of United States v. Estrella, _____________ ________
104 F.3d 3 (1st Cir.), cert.denied, 117 S. Ct. 2494 (1997). ___________
As for the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel,
petitioner has waived it by not presenting it in his 28
U.S.C. 2255 motion. See Dziurgot v. Luther, 897 F.2d 1222, ___ ________ ______
1224 (1st Cir. 1990) (per curiam).
Affirmed. See Local Rule 27.1. ________ ___
-2-