UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1193
VERA C. HARPER, on her behalf and as personal
representative of the Estate of Wilson Clark Harper,
Deceased; DAVID A. HARPER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a USAA; STEVE
LEE; J. LOUIS BLANCO; STEPHEN HORVATH; JANICE BUCHMAN; JUDGE
ROUSCH, Circuit Court Judge; KEITH, Circuit Court Judge;
JUDGE WOLDRIDGE; SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; DOES 1-50;
BARBARA MILANO KEENAN; JOHN THOMAS FREY; DAVID SCHELL;
MARCUS WILLIAMS, Fairfax County Circuit Court Judge; THE
FAIRFAX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; PATRICIA H. HARRINGTON, Clerk
of the Virginia Supreme Court; VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT;
TRICHILO BANCROFT MCGAVIN HORVATH AND JUDKINS PC; ALAN
DICKEY, Seminole County Circuit Court Judge; NANCY ALLEY,
Seminole Circuit County Judge; CLAYTON SIMMONS, Seminole
Circuit Court Judge; ROBERT WOHN, JR., Brevard County
Circuit Court Judge; JAMES PERRY, Florida Supreme Court
Justice; JANICE BUCHMAN; JOHN C. PAPPAS; ERIC DICKEY; BUTLER
PAPPAS WEIHMULLER KATZ CRAIG LLP; JOANN MARIE STALCUP;
FLORIDA BAR; ROBERT PEGG, Indian River County Circuit Court
Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:08-cv-00478-LO-TRJ)
Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vera C. Harper; David A. Harper, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Vera C. Harper and David A. Harper appeal the
magistrate judge’s order denying their motion for leave to file
a third amended complaint, the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
without prejudice their second amended complaint for failure to
serve the defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), and the
district court’s subsequent order denying reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Harper v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, No. 1:08-cv-00478-
LO-TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 2, 2010; Jan. 20, 2011; Feb. 4, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3