UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2246
STEPHANIE SHACKLEFORD; JAVIER DIAZ-BEY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
RIVERSIDE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:11-cv-00127-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephanie Shackleford, Javier Diaz-Bey, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stephanie Shackleford and Javier Diaz-Bey seek to
appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice
their complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief
may be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006). This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541,
545-47 (1949). Because the deficiency identified by the
district court—that the complaint did not assert sufficient
allegations in support of its legal conclusions—may be remedied
by the filing of a complaint that articulates adequate
allegations, we conclude that the order Shackleford and Diaz-Bey
seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v.
Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.
1993).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
2
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
3