H. Austin v. Douglas Peterson & Associates

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2427 H. RICHARD AUSTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DOUGLAS G. PETERSON & ASSOCIATES; STEPHEN HOUGHTON; JIMMY PAU, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00373-BR) Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. H. Richard Austin, Appellant Pro Se. George L. Goodridge, CURTISS, CAREY, GATES, GRAVES & GOODRIDGE, LLP, Greenfield, Massachusetts; Paul Marshall Yoder, WHARTON ALDHIZER & WEAVER, PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: H. Richard Austin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against all defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Assocs., No. 5:11-cv-00373-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2