in Re Charles Williams

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 17, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00425-CR IN RE CHARLES WILLIAMS, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 130th District Court Matagorda County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 07-393 MEMORANDUM OPINION On June 2, 2014, relator Charles Williams filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (West 2004)); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Craig Estlinbaum, presiding judge of the 130th District Court of Matagorda County, to release relator on bond and correct the record to reflect the offense for which relator was actually convicted. Section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the court of appeals to: (1) writs against a “judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district”; and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. Matagorda County is not within our appellate district. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.201(o) (West Supp. 2013). Instead, Matagorda County is within the Thirteenth Court of Appeals district. Id. 22.201(n). Because Matagorda County is not in our appellate district and it is not necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction, we have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus directed at the presiding judge of the 130th District Court. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Panel Consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2