Thomas Poole v. State

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 13, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00115-CR THOMAS POOLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 772266 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant entered a guilty plea to driving while intoxicated, a third degree felony. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on February 10, 1998, to confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant did not appeal the conviction. On December 4, 2013, appellant filed a pro se motion to obtain a free copy of the records from his conviction so that he may pursue an application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. The trial court denied the motion, and appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on January 2, 2014. The clerk’s record was filed on February 7, 2014. The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). In addition, this Court does not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory or post- judgment orders unless that jurisdiction is expressly granted by law. See Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). No statute vests this court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for a free copy of the trial record when the request is not presented in conjunction with a timely-filed direct appeal. See Self v. State, 122 S.W.3d 294, 294–95 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2003, no pet.) (dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction where trial court denied appellant’s request for free copy of trial court’s records to prosecute post-conviction writ of habeas corpus). Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over habeas corpus proceedings after final felony convictions. See Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Ct. App. for the Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Brown. Do Not Publish —Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2