Ex Parte Woodrow Miller

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 4, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00434-CR EX PARTE WOODROW MILLER On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 876249-D MEMORANDUM OPINION On October 16, 2008, appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court. On October 30, 2008, the trial court denied appellant’s application as frivolous pursuant to article 11.072 § 7(a) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until April 26, 2012. A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2