In the
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
_______________
m 02-50887
Summary Calendar
_______________
ARLENE P. MATA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
SAN ANTONIO HOUSING AUTHORITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
m SA-01-CV-741
_________________________
December 20, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and Arlene Mata sued her employer, the San
CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. Antonio Housing Authority, for racial discrim-
ination, alleging that it fired her because she is
PER CURIAM:* Hispanic. The magistrate judge, acting as the
district court by consent, found no issues of
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has
determined that this opinion should not be published
and is not precedent except under the limited circum- (...continued)
(continued...) stances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
material fact and granted summary judgment
to the Authority. Appearing pro se, Mata
appeals.
We have read the briefs and have consulted
pertinent portions of the record. On the basis
of applicable caselaw and the summary judg-
ment record, we affirm, essentially for the rea-
sons given by the magistrate judge in her com-
prehensive Memorandum of Decision and
Order dated and filed August 6, 2002, and
entered on August 7, 2002.
AFFIRMED.
2