Bradfisch, Donald v. Templeton Funds Inc

UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted April 18, 2006 Decided May 19, 2006 Before Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge DONALD BRADFISCH, Appeal from the United States Plaintiff-Appellant, District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. NO. 05-3390 V. No. 05 C 298 TEMPLETON FUNDS, INC. and TEMPLETON GLOBAL Michael J. Reagan, Judge. ADVISORS, LTD., Defendants-Appellees. VINCE KWIATKOWSKI, EDMUND WOODBURY AND Appeals from the United States JOSEPH PARISE, JR., District Court for the Southern Plaintiffs-Appellants, District of Illinois. Nos. 05-3558, 05-3559 & v. Nos. 05 C 299 05-3586 05 C 301 05 C 300 TEMPLETON GROWTH FUND, INC., et al., G. Patrick Murphy, Chief Judge. Defendants-Appellees. Order These four appeals are governed by the Supreme Court's decision in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit, 126 S. Ct. 1503 (2006). Although the plaintiffs maintain Nos. 05-3390, 05-3558, 05-3559 and 05-3586 Page 2 that Dabit does not control because (in their view) the defendant funds have been negligently managed, they have not sought relief through derivative litigation and therefore cannot take advantage of the exception for that kind of suit in the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998. For direct litigation, labels are not material, as we explained in Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust, 403 F.3d 478 (7th Cir. 2005), cert. granted on other grounds, 126 S. Ct. 969 (2006), a decision that the Supreme Court approved in Dabit. These appeals are not affected by the grant of certiorari in Kircher. The Supreme Court limited the writ to a dispute about appellate jurisdiction of appeals by defendants from remand orders under the SLUSA. These defendants did not appeal from the district court's orders in 2004 remanding the suits. They removed again following the decision on the merits in Kircher, and the only appeals have been filed by the plaintiffs. On the authority of Dabit and Kircher, the judgments are affirmed.