COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-15-00645-CV
Style: Prophet Ronald Dwayne Whitfield v. Clear Lake Nissan and Santander
Consumer USA, Inc.
Date motion filed*: September 14, 2015
Type of motion: Amended Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Jurisdiction and
Motions to Strike and for Sanctions
Parties filing motion: Pro Se Appellant
Document to be filed: N/A
Is appeal accelerated? No.
Ordered that motion is:
Granted
Denied
Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
Other: _____________________________________
Although the pro se appellant listed several appellate and trial court cause numbers on
his motion, it was handwritten over the typed answer and original counterclaim of a
First Service Credit Union (“FSCU”), and apparently seeks the dismissal or striking of
FCSU’s answer filed in the unrelated trial court cause number 2015-45473. According
to the trial clerk’s website, while FSCU is listed as a defendant and cross-plaintiff in
No. 2015-45473, there has been no notice of appeal filed in that case. Furthermore,
FSCU is neither listed as an appellee nor cross-appellant in this appellate cause number
01-15-00645-CV. Accordingly, appellant’s amended motion to dismiss appeal for
want of jurisdiction and motions to strike and for sanctions is dismissed as moot
because FSCU is not a party to this appeal and has not filed a cross-appeal.
Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
Date: September 24, 2015
November 7, 2008 Revision