AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed September 25, 2015.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-01483-CR
JEREMY DEMONE WILLIAMS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F10-30956-M
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill
Opinion by Justice Lang
Jeremy Demone Williams appeals his conviction, following the adjudication of his guilt,
for burglary of a habitation. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(a)(1) (West 2011). The trial
court assessed punishment at five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a
brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets
the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional
evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See
High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a
copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he
did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App.
2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
/ Douglas S. Lang/
DOUGLAS S. LANG
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
141483F.U05
-2-
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
JEREMY DEMONE WILLIAMS, Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F10-30956-M).
No. 05-14-01483-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices
Evans and Whitehill participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is
AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered this 25th of September, 2015.
-3-