UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1231
LUCAS MBOLE-LONGONJE; MABEL MEJANE ENANG-EKANE; BELSY
LIMUNGA MBOLE,
Petitioners,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: September 16, 2015 Decided: October 5, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
Maryland, for Petitioners. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer P. Williams, Senior
Litigation Counsel, Jennifer A. Bowen, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lucas Mbole-Longonje, a native and citizen of Cameroon, and
his wife and daughter, derivative beneficiaries Mabel Mejane
Enang-Ekane and Belsy Limunga Mbole, petition for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing
their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s denial of Mbole-
Longonje’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and
protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have
thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of
Mbole-Longonje’s merits hearing, his asylum application, and all
supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does
not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative
findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that
substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v.
Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Mbole-Longonje (B.I.A.
Feb. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2