Affirm and Opinion Filed October 1, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-12-01476-CR
JOSE FRANCISCO ORTEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F01-52273-M
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices FitzGerald, Francis, and Myers
Opinion by Justice Francis
Jose Francisco Ortez appeals from the adjudication of his guilt for aggravated robbery
with a deadly weapon. The trial court assessed punishment at imprisonment for seven years. On
appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and
without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no
arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel
Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right
to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the
appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support
the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
131295F.U05
/Molly Francis/
MOLLY FRANCIS
JUSTICE
‐2‐
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
JOSE FRANCISCO ORTEZ, Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-12-01476-CR V. F01-52273-M).
Opinion delivered by Justice Francis,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices FitzGerald and Myers participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered October 1, 2013
/Molly Francis/
MOLLY FRANCIS
JUSTICE
‐3‐