Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 551
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION IV
No. CV-15-393
Opinion Delivered October 7, 2015
HEATHER KELLEY
APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CONWAY
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. JV-2012-55]
V.
HONORABLE TERRY SULLIVAN,
JUDGE
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF
HUMAN SERVICES AFFIRMED; MOTION TO
APPELLEE WITHDRAW GRANTED
M. MICHAEL KINARD, Judge
This is an appeal from an order terminating appellant’s parental rights to her three
minor children, then ages forty-seven months, thirty-four months, and nineteen months.
Appellant’s attorney has filed a motion to be relieved as counsel and a no-merit brief pursuant
to Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 359 Ark. 131, 194 S.W.3d 739
(2004), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-9(i), asserting that there are no issues of
arguable merit to support the appeal. Counsel’s brief contains an abstract and addendum of
the proceedings below, details all adverse rulings made at the termination hearing, and
explains why there is no meritorious ground for reversal. The clerk of this court sent copies
of the brief and motion to be relieved to the appellant’s last-known address, informing her
of her right to file pro se points for reversal under Rule 6-9(i)(3). Appellant has not filed any
points.
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 551
The two older children in this case were initially removed from appellant’s custody
in August 2012 after their maternal grandmother, with whom they were staying, tested
positive for methamphetamine and appellant could not be located. Once found, appellant
stipulated to probable-cause and dependency-neglect findings based on drug use and
inadequate supervision. A case plan was developed, and appellant would make minimal
progress and then regress. During this time, the third child was born; he remained in
appellant’s custody. After being out of appellant’s custody for nearly two years, the two older
children were placed with appellant on a trial basis. Within a few weeks, however, all three
children were removed—appellant tested positive for methamphetamine, and the children
and the home were found in deplorable conditions. Probable-cause and adjudication
hearings were again held, and all three children were found to be dependent-neglected due
to parental unfitness and neglect.
Because the family had been in the system for over two years, the case soon moved
toward termination of parental rights. At the January 2015 termination hearing, there was
evidence that appellant had not seen the children for the previous two months and had tested
positive for methamphetamine as recently as the month before the hearing. The trial court
expressly found that appellant behaved erratically in court, ranging from confused and
“spaced out,” to giggling, to becoming “angry very quickly.” Testimony was also presented
from an Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) adoption specialist that the children
were adoptable and that she knew of no factors that would prevent adoption. After the
hearing, the trial court found by clear and convincing evidence that termination was in the
2
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 551
children’s best interest and that DHS had proved five statutory grounds for termination as to
the two older children and two grounds as to the youngest child.
From our review of the record and the brief presented to us, we find compliance with
Rule 6-9 and that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to
be relieved and affirm the termination order.
Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
GRUBER and HIXSON , JJ., agree.
Suzanne Ritter Lumpkin, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.
3