Matter of Saini v. Singh

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date filed: 2015-10-07
Citations: 132 A.D.3d 686, 17 N.Y.S.3d 308
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
Matter of Saini v Singh (2015 NY Slip Op 07280)
Matter of Saini v Singh
2015 NY Slip Op 07280
Decided on October 7, 2015
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 7, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
L. PRISCILLA HALL
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.

2014-10977
(Docket No. O-21547-13)

[*1]In the Matter of Jaswinder Kaur Saini, respondent,

v

Harvinder Singh, appellant.




The Virdone Law Firm, P.C., Westbury, N.Y. (John Virdone of counsel), for appellant.

Richard L. Herzfeld, New York, N.Y., for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal from an order of protection of the Family Court, Queens County (Ronald E. Richter, J.), dated October 17, 2014. The order of protection, inter alia, directed the appellant to stay away from the petitioner until and including October 16, 2016, based upon findings, after a hearing, that the appellant committed the family offenses of attempted assault in the third degree, harassment in the second degree, and menacing in the third degree.

ORDERED that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant's guilt of the family offenses of attempted assault in the third degree, harassment in the second degree, and menacing in the third degree was established by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence (see Matter of Monos v Monos, 123 AD3d 931). Further, it appears from the record that the appellant was afforded "meaningful representation" of counsel (Matter of Alfred C., 237 AD2d 517, 517; see Matter of Melissa K. v Brian K., 72 AD3d 1129, 1133).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Accordingly, the Family Court properly issued an order of protection against the appellant.

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HALL and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court