Jesse Loor v. Saily Puentte

Case: 14-15431 Date Filed: 10/07/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-15431 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv-20612-BB JESSE LOOR, individually, and as next friend for J.L. a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SAILY PUENTE, CARIDAD HERMIDA, LISSETTE TARRAGO, OFFICER J. HOROVITZ, #7578, Metro Dade Police Department, OFFICER ROSSI, #5731, Metro Dade Police Department, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (October 7, 2015) Case: 14-15431 Date Filed: 10/07/2015 Page: 2 of 2 Before WILSON, JORDAN, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Jesse Loor, a state pretrial detainee proceeding in forma pauperis, appeals pro se from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). After considering Loor’s brief and conducting a de novo review of the record on appeal, we find that the issues and arguments Loor raises are unavailing. Since Loor is proceeding pro se, we liberally construe his pleadings; however, we may not rewrite Loor’s complaint. See Snow v. DirecTV, Inc., 450 F.3d 1314, 1320 (11th Cir. 2006); Tannenbaum v. United States, 148 F.3d 1262, 1263 (11th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). Loor failed to state a facially plausible claim for relief against any of the named defendants. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009); see also § 1915(e)(2)(B) (compelling dismissal when an in forma pauperis case fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted). Accordingly, Loor’s action was properly dismissed, and we affirm the district court. AFFIRMED. 2