UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6840
VICTOR J. BUENCAMINO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; CHARLES
SAMUELS; NEWTON E. KENDIG; H. WILLIAMS; KENNY ATKINSON;
ASSOCIATE WARDEN COLE; ASSOCIATE WARDEN BOLSTER; ASHLEY
MURRAY; ROBERT E. COCHRANE; BRYON HERBEL; MAUREEN REARDON;
NURSE WILSON; LT. STONE; LT. EATON; LT. PARENT; C.O.
JOHNSON; C.O. CHAPMAN; C.O. JACKET; C.O. BEARD; C.O.
BOLTON; C.O. RICHARDSON; EDWARD LANDIS,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03307-BO)
Submitted: September 29, 2015 Decided: October 9, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor J. Buencamino, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Victor J. Buencamino appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous his complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2012), and denying his various motions.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Buencamino
does not in his informal brief challenge the basis for the
district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review
of the court’s order. Further, we decline to consider the issue
Buencamino does raise on appeal, as he did not properly raise
that issue before the district court. See Muth v. United
States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2