Opinions of the United
1999 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
12-20-1999
United States v Morley
Precedential or Non-Precedential:
Docket 98-1894
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999
Recommended Citation
"United States v Morley" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 325.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/325
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
Filed December 20, 1999
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 98-1894
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
MICHAEL J. MORLEY, II,
Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Criminal Action No. 97-cr-00430-2
District Judge: Hon. Robert F. Kelly
Argued: October 1, 1999
Before: MANSMANN, McKEE, Circuit Judges and
STAPLETON, Senior Circuit Judge
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Slip Opinion filed in
this case on December 8, 1999, be amended as follows:
On page 7, the sentence beginning with "However, in
order for such . . ." that now begins immediately after
the indented quotation should be changed to read as
follows: "Evidence that meets the requirements of Rule
404(b) is relevant and therefore admissible unless
excluded under Rule 403."
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Theodore A. McKee
Circuit Judge
DATED: December 20, 1999
A True Copy:
Teste:
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
2