Opinions of the United
2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
11-5-2003
USA v. Felder
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
Docket No. 03-1365
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003
Recommended Citation
"USA v. Felder" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 133.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/133
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 03-1365
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee
v.
LAVAR FELDER,
Appellant
____________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
(D.C. Crim No. 02-cr-00405 )
District Judge: Honorable Faith S. Hochberg
____________
Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)
November 4, 2003
Before: McKEE, SMITH, and WEIS, Circuit Judges.
(Filed November 5, 2003)
________
OPINION
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 1344 and was sentenced to thirty-months imprisonment. He appeals from the
sentencing court’s denial of his request for downward departure as a minor participant.
1
The defendant deposited an altered, stolen check for $133,938.34 into his
personal bank account and, a few days later, he attempted to withdraw $8,500. Defendant
asserted that he had received the check from a cousin and was to receive 10% of the
proceeds as compensation for the use of his bank account.
The district judge reviewed the facts in detail and, after a spirited
presentation by defense counsel, declined to depart downward. However, defendant was
sentenced at the lower end of the applicable range.
District Courts are granted broad discretion in deciding whether to grant a
downward departure in circumstances such as those present here. See United States v.
Isaza-Zapata, 148 F.3d 236, 238 (3d Cir. 1998). We have found no error in the sentence
imposed by the District Court in this case. See United States v. Brown, 250 F.3d 811 (3d
Cir. 2001).
Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
/s/ Joseph F. Weis, Jr.
Circuit Judge
2