McDonnell v. Comm Social Security

Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-25-2003 McDonnell v. Comm Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket 02-2789 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003 Recommended Citation "McDonnell v. Comm Social Security" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 718. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/718 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 02-2789 JOSEPH MCDONNELL, Appellant v. *JOANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY * (Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 43 (c)) On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania District Judge: Honorable John P. Fullam (D.C. Civ. No. 01-00035) Argued February 27, 2003 BEFORE: SCIRICA, GREENBERG, and GIBSON*, Circuit Judges (Filed: March 24, 2003) *Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. Eric J. Fischer (argued) Breyer Office Park, Suite 110 8380 Old York Road Elkins Park, Pa. 19027 Attorney for Appellant Patrick L. Meehan United States Attorney Susan Skirtich Assistant United States Attorney Eastern District of Pennsylvania 615 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pa. 19106 James A. Winn Regional Chief Counsel Eda L. Giusti (argued) Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration P.O. Box 41777 Philadelphia, Pa. 19101 Attorneys for Appellee OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. Appellant Joseph McDonnell appeals from an order entered May 29, 2002, in the district court approving and adopting the report and recommendation of magistrate judge Linda K. Caracappa dated April 24, 2002, and granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security in this disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income case. On this appeal we exercise plenary review over the decision of the 2 district court, Knepp v. Apfel, 204 F.3d 78, 83 (3d Cir. 2000), but we must uphold the Commissioner’s decision if supported by substantial evidence. See Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 390, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1422 (1971). There is, however, a special situation here in which McDonnell challenges the fairness of the administrative proceedings as he contends that the administrative law judge who considered the case following the remand did not decide the case on the entire record. We regard this contention as raising a legal issue which we consider de novo. See Knepp, 204 F.3d at 83. Inasmuch as the magistrate judge comprehensively set forth the background of this case in her report and recommendation we do not repeat it. We have examined the record and are satisfied that applying the appropriate standards of review we have no basis to disturb the order for summary judgment. Consequently the order of May 29, 2002, will be affirmed. /s/ Morton I. Greenberg Circuit Judge 3