United States v. Thomas

Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-8-2003 USA v. Thomas Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket 01-4283 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003 Recommended Citation "USA v. Thomas" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 893. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/893 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________ NO. 01-4283 __________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LISA THOMAS, Appellant ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania D.C. No.: 99-cr-00722-1 District Judge: Honorable J. Curtis Joyner ____________ Argued: October 15, 2002 Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, ROTH, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges. (Opinion filed December 31, 2002) ___________________________________ ORDER AMENDING OPINION ___________________________________ The slip opinion in the above case is hereby amended as follows: 1. On page 8, the first line of the first full paragraph, insert the word “only” after “considered.” 2. On page 8, in the first full paragraph, line 5, substitute “need” for “does.” 3. On page 10, line 8, insert “ Id. at 351.” after “promises.” 4. On page 16, footnote 4, line 5, delete “Furthermore” and begin the sentence with “Unlike.” 5. On page 23, line 4, remove the parenthesis before “cmt.” BY THE COURT: /s/ Max Rosenn Circuit Judge Dated: January 8, 2003